Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • oxford-university-press-humsoc
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Readability of product ingredient labels can be improved by simple means: an experimental study
University of Arts, Crafts and Design, The Department of Design, Crafts and Art (DKK).
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Contact Dermatitis, ISSN 0105-1873, E-ISSN 1600-0536, Vol. 71, no 4, p. 233-241Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Summary Background Ingredient labels on products used by consumers and workers every day, such as food, cosmetics, and detergents, can be difficult to read and understand. Objective To assess whether typographical design and ordering of ingredients can improve the readability of product ingredient labels. Methods The study subjects (n = 16) had to search for two target ingredients in 30 cosmetic product labels and three alternative formats of each. Outcome measures were completion time (reading speed), recognition rate, eye movements, task load and subjective rating when the reading of ingredient labels was assessed by video recording, an eye tracking device, and questionnaires. Results The completion time was significantly lower ( p < 0.001) when subjects were reading all alternative formats than when they were reading the original. The recognition rate was generally high, and improved slightly with the alternative formats. The eye movement measures confirmed that the alternative formats were easier to read than the original product labels. Mental and physical demand and effort were significantly lower ( p < 0.036) and experience rating was higher ( p < 0.042) for the alternative formats. There were also differences between the alternative formats. Conclusions Simple adjustments in the design of product ingredient labels would significantly improve their readability, benefiting the many allergic individuals and others in their daily struggle to avoid harmful or unwanted exposure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2014. Vol. 71, no 4, p. 233-241
Keywords [en]
Ingredient, Nutrition Labeling, Consumer Perception, Consumer Acceptance, User Factors
National Category
Design Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:konstfack:diva-9849DOI: 10.1111/cod.12274OAI: oai:DiVA.org:konstfack-9849DiVA, id: diva2:1893710
Available from: 2024-08-30 Created: 2024-08-30 Last updated: 2025-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
The Department of Design, Crafts and Art (DKK)
In the same journal
Contact Dermatitis
DesignPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 125 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • oxford-university-press-humsoc
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf